RNC Welcoming Committee to Unmask, Answer Questions

PRESS ADVISORY:
10am Thursday, 627 Smith Avenue, St. Paul.
Photo and interview opportunities
Contact: rncwcmedia@riseup.net, 202-277-5262

In light of the massive police and military violence playing out each day of the Republican National Convention, the targeting, entrapment, and persecution of protest logistics organizers, the inhumane conditions that continue for the hundreds of people in the Ramsey County Jail, and the harassment of supporters outside the jail, we in the RNC Welcoming Committee are not backing down from our organizing. The Welcoming Committee is working harder than ever to ensure that our friends and comrades are safe and that protesters who are speaking their minds in the face of repression have access to food, housing, bicycles, a meeting space, workshops, legal/jail support, and medical care.

The St Paul Police Department, the City of St Paul, and particularly Bob Fletcher with the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department have labeled us a "criminal enterprise", painting a picture of us and other anti-RNC organizers as faceless terrorists. On Thursday, September 4th at 10 AM on the 2nd floor of the RNC Convergence Space at 627 Smith Ave S., we will show the true faces and stories of the RNC Welcoming Committee.

We will show the 2nd floor of the convergence center as it was arranged at the time of the police raid last Friday night. We will give the latest information on the RNC 8, and we will take and answer questions. Afterwards, several members of the Welcoming Committee will be available for interview and photo opportunities.

The joint press conference will also feature the Poor People's Economic Human Rights Campaign.

Comments

request for press conference

Reports that Ramsey confiscated a gun or guns from the Welcoming Committee are being exploited in order to give credence to the terrorism charge...

I have seen explanations for all the other household items, but for some reason people don't want to or haven't felt the need to address this one.

Hopefully this will be addressed at the press conference.

OMFG, They've got GUNS!!!!

In the United States, many of the most important rights of people are enumerated in the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the US Constitution of 1789. The First Amendment concerns itself with freedom of speech; the Second Amendment concerns itself with the right to keep and bear arms; and so on. You can read the document yourself (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UnitedStatesBillofRights) The Second Amendment was drawn up in times where there were no police forces, and standing armies were viewed not as the guarantors of liberty, but as a grave threat to liberty. “Standing armies” equate not only to the Armed Forces, but also to police forces as well, since they are privileged to have military weapons which no “civilian” may possess and to use those weapons in the course of their duties or in response to orders from their superiors.

The law in Japan is different than in the US - Japanese subjects do not enjoy the same rights as do US citizens. Their tradition of government comes down from a day, not long gone, when it was the right of samurai to hack people walking in the streets to bloody shreds with absolute impunity. Common people did not have the right to carry a sword or any kind of bladed weapon or use it in self-defense. Now, Japan is different, but the police still have the right to enter private homes at will and search without a warrant, and to detain and interrogate citizens for as long as they please and the citizen has no right to counsel. Japanese culture is still radically different from American culture, at least as far as individual rights are concerned.

In contrast, the Wikipedia article (http://en.wikipedia.or/wiki/SecondAmendmenttotheUnitedStatesConstitution) on the Second Amendment is most informative:

“The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution is a part of the United States Bill of Rights that protects the pre-existing individual right to possess and carry weapons (i.e. “keep and bear arms”) in case of confrontation.[1] Codification of the right to keep and bear arms into the Bill of Rights was influenced by a fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule through a standing army or select militia,[2] since history had shown the way tyrants eliminated resistance to suppression of political opponents was to simply take away the people’s arms and make it an offense to keep them.[3] In District of Columbia v. Heller (June 26, 2008), the Supreme Court ruled that self-defense is a central component of the right.[4]”

In fact, one of the most famous of the Founding Fathers, Patrick Henry, stated: “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined. … O sir, we should have fine times, indeed, if, to punish tyrants, it were only sufficient to assemble the people! Your arms, wherewith you could defend yourselves, are gone; … Did you ever read of any revolution in a nation, brought about by the punishment of those in power, inflicted by those who had no power at all? … Will your mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined regiment?”

From our laws and tradition, it is absolutely irresponsible if a citizen does not have a gun… not the other way around, as you propose.

Media Distortions

On tuesday night Fox news reported that three homemade bombs were detonated by anarchists in st. paul. It was clear from the video footage that the explosions were concussion grenades being shot by police at a group of people and exploding amidst them. I applaud the Welcoming Committee for unmasking, it's a brave move, but given that several agencies already know the identities this is a tactic that can assist in individuals' safety. Good Luck, Thanks to all the medics, legal observers, and independent journalists that despite police brutality, and corporate media distortions risked their personal safety to assist people in the streets and in doing so, helped unlock some of the truths.
Solidarity and in the spirit of the motion,
Nilz

Watch out for agents provacatuers

There are doubtless many opinions on the limits to what is acceptiable as radicals in terms of disruption. Movement building requires a true leftist to work with people who have different tolerances. however, what is clear is that the state will spare no efforts to destroy protest movements, and they will do that by provoking violence.

I was a student during the Vietnam war. We planned protests against targets like Dow and Honeywell. Some were involved in civil disobedience, some were doing vigils, but the collective effect was to make it clear that the US was THE rogue state.

Now about that time, we had a guy how up at our collective, and he befriended us, even living with one of the women. he klept pushing for violence, tryinghard to get us to go beyong our self-imposed limits. Turned out this guy was a spy for the municipal police department (we learned this through a very complex set of circumstances). But before we learned that, he just up and disappaered.

Anyway, beware lectiures on the seconmd amendment from someone posting on this forum (and several others)....this is just disinformation attempting to divide the left. I do not know any leftists who get into med with the militia-right and advocate for the use of guns.

i believe that the gun thing is PROBABLY a plant...as it is obvious that the state is trying toincrease repression in this post 9-11 age. If the persons advocating FOR guns are NOT state agents, then they are in the minority, even among most anarchists.It is important fortrue anarchists to avoid being coopted by the man. But be careful, the intent of the state is to sow confusion and create fake allies who then bring down the movement. Some may decry those who advocate avoisingviolence s "liberals," but there are many radicals with all shades of viewpoints,and the mark of a true radical is that she or hewill workto have overall cooperation with a broad spectrum of the left. Those who think they can make revolution tomorrow without having the majority of people on their side are just engaging in a fntasy While Iknow that people are loathe to criticize lest they be accused of being counter-revolutionary, be aware of the agents provacateurs in your midst who are just hoping to discredit a whole movement by getting a significant number of people convicted of weapons possesion.

Treat any calls to overt violence as the work of the police unless you can verify otherwise.

I'm not a State Agent

and I'm not advocating that people take up arms against the Government. I am encouraging people to exercise *all* of their Constitutional rights, and this means not only the freedom of speech, but also the right to keep and bear arms. I do not advocate violence against anyone, but if rights are not exercised, they are lost.

Playing devil's advocate

Playing devil's advocate here...

"Did you ever read of any revolution in a nation, brought about by the punishment of those in power, inflicted by those who had no power at all?"

This is true, but power does not necessarily mean guns. Consider Gandhi.

The cops are making this

The cops are making this stuff up. They are pretty desperate to demonize anarchists in the public eye in order to justify their crazy repression. They've ended up getting more people to sympathize with us.

And why would you throw feces at pigs who are already wallowing in their own shit?

I would rather be associated

I would rather be associated with anarchists throwing shit and urine at police than to be associated with the police who are hated and feared by the community. At the end of the day, anarchists still come out smelling like roses. After the RNC convention is over, the local police will go back to harassing, terrorizing, beating and killing people in the community. Anarchists never do that. And community members will respect anarchists for fighting back.

The police lost another one this week in St. Paul.

This is just too easy for us anarchists.

Actually...I'm pretty sure

Actually...I'm pretty sure people are scared of the riot cops. I have at least 4 friends/family members who need to be in downtown st. paul for work or on their way to work, and all they told me was that they were scared of the cops. 3 of them got caught up in pepper spray/tear gas while just waiting for bus/walking to work. Everynight when I would bus back home, people on the bus were all talking about how they were terrified of the countless stormtroopers, and didn't see the protestors doing anything wrong.

So yeah, despite what you think, the image of a police state (regardless of whether or not St. Paul actually has been a police state over the past 4 days, it certainly has had the IMAGE of that, you can't really argue with that) is actually VERY scary to the average person.

I heard people on their cell phones saying "stay away from downtown, there are a zillion riot cops" not "stay away from downtown, there are protesters who are going to gas you and arrest 800 people"

Are people usually scared of

Are people usually scared of cops?

Yes, unless they're in a position of power that enables them not to be.

Are they scared of arrest?

Probably.

Would they normally be scared of going downtown?

I have no idea, but at least you correctly identify the police as a protection racket. Good show.

So, when did they begin to get scared of the area?

When the cops swarmed, seized and stayed. To steal a few words.

But your made up assertions of what other people think should suffice.

Children are taught to love

Children are taught to love and adore police officers. Moreover, "what do children think of..." is an asinine argument for anything and an emotional appeal. It is an interesting view into how the law and order types view the rest of us, though: Children, unable to care for ourselves, needing their billy clubs... shoved up the ass, was it?... when we violate their established order.

I am interested to know what laws I broke, though, and when and what proof you have for your accusations, especially given that I'm anonymous.

There is no due process for

There is no due process for the pigs, they are allowed to do as they please. I've seen guns pointed at my friends, I've seen houses trashed, I've seen people just standing around get gassed, maced and beaten, I've seen people come out of jail covered in bruises and cuts, I've heard from people on the inside of the jail what they were doing to people in there. How the hell does that add up to "unprovoked attacks on cops?" In every instance I've seen this week, they started the violence. They have the guns, the chemical weapons, the body armor, the military vehicles, the national guard, helicopters and so on. Pull your head out of the fucking sand.

your words mean nothing

to anyone reading this site. stop wasting your time, swine. You think we were born yesterday? for all your macho talk and fascist pseudo-justifications, there weren't a whole lot of so-called "law-abiding citizens" who were impressed by the way St. Paul's Finest acted this past week.

don't think you can get away with this shit without repercussions. the people you claim to protect aren't going to tolerate their children being swept up in house raids at gunpoint in the middle of the night, pepper-sprayed, brutalized, and otherwise terrorized for long before you start seeing more and more and more and more black masks in the streets.

also, i think we can safely assume that most of you aren't idiots, either. you know we represent a threat to your fragile hierarchies; you know that around the world, resistance to your agenda is everywhere. violence cannot stop an idea like anarchism. you may have guns, bombs, and prisons, but we have something infinitely more powerful: solidarity.

have a nice day.

Why do anarchists run to the

Why do anarchists run to the media in response to repression, when the media is fully complicit with the forces of repression? This goes both for the liberal/leftist/"independent media" who quickly move to define anarchists as 'non-violent protesters' and 'citizens expressing dissent with the current administration' (implicit in this is support for another set of rulers) and corporate media, who cooperate with law enforcement on every level. A media videocamera is no different from a police camera.

“The media has another essential function. It is the creator of images for consumption. It creates celebrities and personalities for people to look up to and vicariously live through. It creates role images for people to imitate in order to invent their “identity”. It creates images of events separated from and placed above life. It is through these images, ingested uncritically, that people are to view and interpret the world, formulating their opinions out of this virtual unreality…

In choosing to seek to get one’s ideas across through the media, one is choosing to feed these ideas to this masticating monster, to offer one’s self to this life-draining ghoul. For anarchists this makes no sense. It is impossible for the media to portray anarchism as a living praxis or anarchists as complex multi-dimensional individuals. It is therefore not possible to express anarchist ideas in a worthwhile way through this forum. The ideas will be chewed up and shat out as one opinion among many, one more turd about whose odor the public can argue. The living individuals get chewed up and shat out as images-of freaks, of intellectual brooders, of street rioters-but essentially as images not living, acting beings. The media is part of the power structure, and, as such, is our enemy. We can’t play their game and win.”

Why is anyone surprised or offended by the actions of the police? We are their enemies, and they are treating us as such, just as we should treat them.

Most anarchists agree with

Most anarchists agree with you, but at the same time, we need to do what we can to support arrested people. That means we have to engage the mainstream media, even though they lie and slander us and support the police. Engaging the media is politics and politics is war via different means.

We should give ourselves credit for all of the alternative media that we've constructed that gets this news out to the public.

"Engaging the media is

"Engaging the media is politics and politics is war via different means."

This is precisely why anarchists should not cooperate with the media.

video of conference

Has there been a video of the press conference posted anywhere online?

Just Us In Amerika

While the RNC8 face felony terrorism charges, a laughable allegation if there ever was one, the government has dismissed conspiracy charges against the three people plotting to assassinate Barack Obama.

revolutionary humility and down with the doozle brains

soon this will be over, the majority of the charges will be dropped because they are fabricated, fantastical and fabricated. Remember when they raided Minnehaha because a group of 'anarchists had weapons', that came from an informer too, real reliable those doozle brains who get paid to make shit up, real fantastical shit gets more attention allows them to request a bigger budget, allows the little rats to get bigger pieces of booger cheese to munch on.

then we will be back to business as usual, yep, slow, boring empire and ecocide, consumption and coersive relationships. did you burn any bridges between people this week to rack up cool points? did you put street tactics and security culture over friendships and community and where you live? did you realize that most folks in town were not at these protests, were not listening, do not get what it was all about, and it's not just the media's fault either.

is it justified to be pissed as hell at the republicans, sure enuf, but if it hadn't been mostly white kids out in the streets, i know not entirely, but come on let's admit it, mostly, there would have been live ammo, real attack dogs, tanks, the army, and a lot more than eight people facing charges. did any of you take the time to go to region's hospital to see the folks who were beaten up brutally by the police, not for protesting, but just for being poor and relatively powerless and walking through their neighborhoods, or the folks who didn't go home all week long because they don't have the right papers to be here and couldn't get to where they live. i know, there's been a lot of great solidarity with the poor peoples' march and campaign, but the local impacts of this are immense and all those cool little toys the pooh pooh play with will return to certain neighborhoods and used against people who riot mostly when their loved ones are killed.

much respect, for real to all of you who braved a lot of repression. it's just important to put that repression into context so our little heads don't explode with self-importance. revolutionary humility. stand by and for eachother, hold up the sky and eachother always, and never ever sacrifice your comrades for the sake of the temporary autonomous zone.

Thanks for this post. I

Thanks for this post. I think this has been on a lot of our minds this past week. I know I personally have been dealing with all this shit and recognize that this is everyday life for a lot of people. It only hardens my resolve. Sorry to not articulate this better... just can't right now.

That's bullshit. What's your

That's bullshit. What's your problem with white youth? America is majority white, the Twin Cities are majority white. White working-class people have just as much a right to be fucking angry as anybody else. Christ's sake...

Don't need a Weatherman to know White privilege

Yes, and we live in a white supremacist society. That guarantees special privileges for white people. More job opportunities, more lenient sentencing in front of judges. Less reason to worry about the cops unless they are rioting. You know, daily stuff, driving a car, looking for a job, relationships. Yeah, white kids have a right to be angry, punk rock all the way. But do you really think the majority of the kids who were out in the street were 'working-class'? Does that mean that they actually have a regular job? How did they grow up? Are they college educated? I am willing to bet the farm on the fact that most of the kids, I know, not all, but most of the kids doing direct action come from middle class or even upper middle class backgrounds. Kind of like the 'militant radical middle class white kids in the sixties' the SDS and Weather Underground who mostly came out of privilege and their choice of tactics showed this. This merely means that their parents were professionals, you know doctors, lawyers, teachers, they grew up with health insurance, summer vacations, travelled to europe in college. And the tactics that are chosen, and seen as the most 'radical' are individualistic, short sighted and not very smart strategically. And more than that, not very collectivist in nature and certainly don't allow people who are more marginalized by society to participate, actually kept certain contingents like the immigrant rights contingent smaller than it would have been.

This critique is not designed to put anyone down or make less important the fact that there was resistance to the republicans. But you have to look at White Supremacy and racism and how it plays out in our movements and in the choice of our tactics. As a majority white movement, the direct action movement needs to be committed to an anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-homophobic and anti-classist agenda and that includes dialogue about what tactics make sense. There also needs to be a discussion about all the macho crap that parades as strategy, lets go fight the cops even if we have pathetically small numbers and will be easily picked off. Those voices are often the voices of infiltrators and provocateurs who encourage folks to carry out actions that will get those involved put in jail and often without the sympathy of the larger community, because again we need to look at the groups that we claim to be fighting for, you know the 'working class'. Were those folks out in the street? Did our tactics pull them closer and find sympathy and win hearts and minds, you know 80 percent of folks in this country are against the war and think that the economy sucks...so you'd think there would be a connection there.

Middle class kids grow up on the model of the hero, individualistic, and work to be the next Abby Hoffmann, Jerry Rubin, Tom Hayden. It's sexy to pick up a tear gas canister and throw it back at a line of cops wearing gas masks, it's a huge adrenaline rush, and then it's off to jail and most likely the sentence is reduced because you have a college degree and the judge knows that you will wise up eventually, I mean have you seen the pictures of Norm Coleman, long hair, protesting the Vietnam war, now he's a senator. A lot of the weathermen went on to become college professors and stock brokers, not working down at the Ford Plant or in a garmet factory or sweat shop. It's cool to think that middle class white kids are going to lead the revolution, but they are not. It's impossible, they have as much stake in the system as the people they are fighting against. It's important to look at this and realize that unless a consciousness around combating all forms of oppression is a cornerstone of a movement of white kids, they will end up replicating all of the fucked up patterns of the society that they inherit.

And last but not least. If you are a bunch of white kids who decide to riot and break a window or two (not a very successful riot/ can do that in a small affinity group alone at night and not go to jail), then that becomes the story. Not the poor peoples' march or the situation of immigrants or the voices of vets coming back from the war and facing unemployment and no health insurance, or the family who just lost their home and who are now out on the streets, the story becomes one of police tactics and protester rage, and that's it: tear gas, batons and people crying foul at their treatment. The issues facing our communities are lost. And a lot of people turn off the T.V. and put down the newspaper and know that the hidden story in this is privilege, people who can afford to riot because they don't die doing it.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <span> <div> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <img> <map> <area> <hr> <br> <br /> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <table> <tr> <td> <em> <b> <u> <i> <strong> <font> <del> <ins> <sub> <sup> <quote> <blockquote> <pre> <address> <code> <cite> <embed> <object> <param> <strike> <caption>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.