Dave Mahoney Pleads Guilty to Assault; State Drops Other Nine Felonies in Bargain
Copied below is a solidarity statement written and released by the Community RNC Arrestee Support Structure (CRASS).
a message from the Community RNC Arrestee Support Structure (rncaftermath.org)
Monday morning in Ramsey County District Court, RNC activist Dave Mahoney pled – under pressure and significant duress – to a single count of second degree assault, a felony. Instead of going to trial on the 10 felony counts stemming from a single invented incident, Dave and the office of Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner agreed to a plea bargain. Given the disproportionately ferocious, political prosecution, Dave and his attorney evidently found it in their best interest to agree to a 90-day cap on jail time, reduction of the (single) felony charge to a gross misdemeanor after the sentence is served, and the ability for Dave to return to his native England after the jail term. With credit for good behavior and time served, Dave is looking at 56 days or less in jail, as opposed to the decades possible if he had lost at trial.
Of the dozens of RNC charges heard in open court, authorities have not won a single conviction. The manipulation and reliance on overtly authoritarian pressure evidenced in Dave’s case is indicative of the only tactic the state has left to justify the police brutality and fiscal waste characterizing the RNC and its aftermath. Dave faced two, then six, and ultimately ten charges. First accused of aiding and abetting the drop of a bag of sand in front of a slow-moving delegate bus on a closed highway exit ramp, authorities then levied a count of terroristic threats and assault for each so-called "victim" on the bus who claimed to feel "terrorized." All together, Dave eventually was looking at decades behind bars and a dramatically tainted jury pool until the prosecution made the sudden plea offer last week. The absurdity of the state's persecution should be apparent, but so should the impossible position in which Dave was placed. Indeed, what would you do under similar circumstances?
In a letter to his lawyer last December, prosecutor Richard Dusterhoft called his case "by far the most serious RNC case I have" (an assertion we find silly at best). He has referred to Dave as the "poster boy of the RNC" in open court. Similarly, during the presentation of the Heffelfinger-Luger Report in January, Andrew Luger called the alleged bag of sand incident "the most frightening moment of the convention," apparently overlooking the pre-emptive raids, state-sponsored shutdown of downtown, and hundreds of brutal injuries caused by police.
It is, of course, too much to ask that agents of the state consider such things. The cognitive dissonance could prove fatal, what with so many careers to further, so many dollars to grab, so many atrocities to excuse. If an activist like Dave -- whose community believes him, as we do, completely innocent of the anything resembling assault or terror crimes (if in fact there was ever a crime at all) -- has to serve months in jail on a politician's whim, so be it. There are, of course, priorities. That those priorities fail to align with common sense or justice is neither here nor there.
Back in reality, Dave, his comrades, and friends -- from England to the Twin Cities and beyond -- are not guilty of assaulting delegates. Rather, they and we are launching assaults on the interlocking systems of injustice and oppression which keep all of us in one form of prison or another. Like Dave, we didn’t and don’t commit this assault with bags of dirt or pointed fingers; we attack the system with continuous, relentless organizing in a diversity of forms, seen and unseen. That those who benefit most from temporary power fail to recognize this should surprise no one.
The state-sanctioned kidnappings of our friends by cartoonishly villianous stooges like Bob Fletcher – the very embodiment of corruption and contemptible, scabrous sleaze, as even the mainstream press and the FBI are starting to realize – and the subsequent legitimizing of these crimes by other criminally smarmy agents of the state should not stop anyone. Until borders have been broken and police prevented from terrorizing our communities in the manner they do every day, we will continue to assault any system that withholds our basic needs and denies our wild dreams.
Due to the nature of these battles waged within the confines of the criminal injustice system, there is of course more to be said -- but it must wait. If you, too, have dreams of love, rage, and freedom, perhaps you too can say some of it under your breath. More important than what we can or cannot say, however, is what we can do.
The RNC happened in our community, but the interests it served and the repression it entailed are fundamental to the structure of this society … indeed, the world system. Don’t forget. From the RNC 8 to the RNC Others; the Tarnac 9; the AETA 4; and all those past and present - defend ALL targets of state repression.
RNC 8: rnc8.org
Jesse Forrey, currently on trial call: supportjessejames.wordpress.com
Christina Vana and Karen Meissner: helpmkethree.blogspot.com
Write to Glenn Dyer, incarcerated in Ramsey County until at least June 13, at:
Glenn David Dyer
297 S. Century Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55119
Write to the Texas Two, Bradley Crowder and David McKay, serving 2 and 4 years in prison, respectively, as well as Matt DePalma, at (this address will change in a few weeks):Sherburne County Jail
13880 Highway 10
13880 Business Center Drive
Elk River, MN 55330-4601
- 3636 reads
- Printer-friendly version


Comments
Much love and solidarity with
Much love and solidarity with Dave and the others in jail or facing charges stemming from the RNC.
solidarity revisited?
Starting to rethink this whole anarchist solidarity line. Is it part of a conspiracy to keep well-meaning but not-very-savvy young-uns in the group as involuntary cover for truly radical violent revolutionaries. I really don't know how else to explain the apparent moral disconnect found here (ie., those that either deny he did it or think he was justified in doing it).
So, true colors ... if you are a part of this movement and you are really okay with physically harming people because of their politics ... kinda disturbing ... to say the least.
if you have a problem harming
if you have a problem harming people whose politics are killing millions of people, i find that more disturbing.
though nobody was even harmed in this incident, just some old fuckers got scared. boo hoo, they got a tiny glimpse of what it must be like to live in iraq.
Totally, Saddam was a
Totally, Saddam was a nightmare. Thanks for pointing out the good work of our troops.
How often did Saddam bomb
How often did Saddam bomb Baghdad?
Iraq war
The U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq is bullshit, but Saddam was no saint.
Are you kidding me? If
Are you kidding me? If bombing is the barometer, consider the torture Saddam carried out on a daily basis. Waterboarding is a walk in the park compared to the torture and executions by his regime. If you're unsure, here's a report of the human rights abuses:
www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hrdossier.pdf
Right, so his humans rights
Right, so his humans rights abuses totally justify our bombing of civilians in Iraq. If that were true, countries could bomb the US based on the unconscionable treeatment of prisoners, which Amenesty International has called a huge disgrace.
I'm not sure I understand.
I'm not sure I understand. Are you equating the unintentional consequences of war with the intentional torture and execution of said civilians? Now, we can argue whether it was right to go to war or not but there should be no debate about my original point. There is no comparison between life under Saddam and life there now. Are you suggesting you would be happier with Saddam still alive and in power? Many more dead and/or tortured Iraqis would disagree.
there is nothing
there is nothing unintentional about the death of civillians in modern warfare. its part of the package. life under Saddam was shit. i don't think life under occupation and sectarian war is much better.
Are you equating our
Are you equating our treatment of prisoners with Saddam's treatment of civilians?
Your logic is as weak as your
Your logic is as weak as your flacid penis. The torture by Saddam can obviously not be seen as a motivator for US foreign interventions and global military strategy for the very reason that they supported him during some of the worst of this torture, that always pales in comparison to its own.
It is doubtful that anyone
It is doubtful that anyone was even scared by this...
theres video that suggests
theres video that suggests otherwise
believe and it will set you free!!!!
Do you believe everything that you see or read?! How do we even know this is any way related to Dave?
Good riddance
Let him serve the full 56, then deport him. That's enough burden for the taxpayers.
Next time you travel to the United States and Minnesota, Mr. Mahoney, respect the political rights of our citizens and don't riot.
citizens can't be deported
He can't be deported. He was born in the U.S.A. He is a citizen.
Read the article
"Mahoney will likely serve a maximum of 56 days in jail and then be able to return to his native England".
Deport him.
born in the US, moved to the
born in the US, moved to the UK at age 2 or something...
Yes! Dave was born in the
Yes! Dave was born in the U.S.A. and therefore, according to the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, he is a citizen of the United States, AND of the state wherein he resides. I know for a fact that Dave is residing in Minnesota and So he is one of us, a Minnesotan.
Additionally, Dave is a superb, excellent man. Now, all we have to do is teach him to appreciate lutefisk, right?
Deport him
"Mahoney will likely serve a maximum of 56 days in jail and then be able to return to his native England".
(emphasis added)
Idiot. Dave was born in the
Idiot. Dave was born in the U.S., Pennsylvania in fact. I personally heard him say that earlier this week. His Mom says so too. He's one of us, for whatever points that gets one. Its a goddam heavy burden being an American and I recommend a look at the 5:30 news to understand why. He's also, in Iron fact, a citizen of Minnesota as set out in the constitution of the U.S.A. Take a civics course, eh.
READ THE ARTICLE
I quote "haloka": "Mahoney will likely serve a maximum of 56 days in jail and then be able to return to his native England".
Emphasis added.
The article is incorrect.
The article is incorrect. Dave was born in Pennsylvania, moved to England with his parents when he was a toddler. I don't know why I'm even wasting time on an idiot. Read Susan Mahoney's open letter to Susan Gaertner, see above for the link. And, I myself heard Dave say, on Friday the 29th., that he was born in the U.S. "His native England" is wrong, incorrect. Idiot.
The article is incorrect.
Since the article is incorrect and was submitted by Haloka, you're calling Haloka an idiot.
Take it up with him.
such blubbering idiots are
such blubbering idiots are worth our time...
Rights? You're only talking about "Your" rights.
It's wrong that Dave has to serve even a day for speaking out against our sham of a democracy. Everyone has rights in this country, or at least that's how it's used to be. Now. since the Patriot Act no one can stand up without being struck down.
He isn't serving a day for
He isn't serving a day for speaking out. He's serving time for throwing a sandbag at a bus. That has always been illegal, pre or post-patriot act. I don't think anyone has argued against his right to speak out.
throwing sandbags
... throwing sandbags off bridges was illegal before the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act. The First Amendment protects speech. Throwing sandbags off bridges is not speech. Not even a gray area.
What would I do under similar
What would I do under similar circumstances? Probably not drop a sand bag off a bridge while a bus is passing below. People have been killed due to such idiotic actions in the past. I'm curious, why are you all so quick to condemn the police when you get a whiff of pepper spray but haven't the intelligence to consider how your own actions could have severe consequences? This guy ought to go back home and stay out of our country if he plans to act like an idiot. I suspect he's now learned his lesson.
dehumanization or compassion?
When you set up an enemy (the police state) you have to dehumanize its agents (police officers) to maintain their enemy status, then you can deride the "cops" for their actions and behaviors. Some protesters do to police and prosectors exactly what police and prosecutors do to some protesters - dehumanize them. It's a war!
The remedy to dehumanization is empathy and compassion.
Rather than feeding the conflict, transform it. Find common ground. Build community together.
There is no common ground or
There is no common ground or community to be had with cops until they stop being cops.
Oh my jesus this hippy-dippy
Oh my jesus this hippy-dippy crap is ridiculous.
What common ground do we have with a police force that murder innocent people because of the color of their skin and then gets away with it? What common ground do we have with a government that locks up our comrades for nothing more than organizing a protest?
common ground examples
We may not have common ground with a"force," but we have common ground with the individuals that wear the uniform and with the officers that make decisions.
Common ground:
1. Humanness (unless cops are really reptiles =)
2. May have similar values, goals (I know some of them and they want the same things I want - a better world for our kids and less violence).
3. Our kids may go to the same school.
4. They may be political allies.
5. Each has different kinds of power to help and problem solve for the betterment of community. Examples:
http://www.boardistan.com/?p=8473
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/04/only-in-denmark-helmets.php
http://www.startribune.com/local/stpaul/46478142.html?elr=KArks:DCiUHc3E7_V_nDaycUiacyKUUr
http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/default.asp?item=36
Just because something is
Just because something is made of flesh and blood, with a face like us does not mean it can't also be met with violence.
The human obviously includes an essential cabability to be forces of violence and to recipiants of it as well. There doesn't have to be anything dehumanizing at all.
Violence also does not disclude a lack of compassion. Such shallow thinking...
The sand bag Dave is accused
The sand bag Dave is accused of dropping didn't land anywhere near a bus and he is a US citizen, not that your xenophobic bullshit has any merit anyway.
knowledge and discernment
Nobody: "The sand bag Dave is accused of dropping didn't land anywhere near a bus ..."
"Nobody" contends that a sandbag, presumably thrown by somebody, did land somewhere. :)
Theoretically speaking: If a sandbag was thrown and did land close to a bus might it be assault?
Mn Statutes: "Assault" is: (1) an act done with intent to cause fear in another of immediate bodily harm or death; or (2) the intentional infliction of or attempt to inflict bodily harm upon another.
The video I saw shows a sandbag thrown just feet away and moments before a second one is thrown. The second one lands on a bus. You think the first one didn't land near a bus.
Unfortunately the city has removed the Heffelfinger-Lugar report, so there is no way to post the video and photos that were publicly available for over 6 months. Anyone out there have them? Can you post a link? Maybe if people saw it for themselves, the effects of the koolaid would wear off.
According to the still from the video, the person standing next to the person throwing the second sandbag had a very distinctive low back tatoo that was revealed when he leaned over the railing.
When black bloc fashion doesn't hide your identity...
StarTrib:
Man accused of tossing sandbag on I-94 pleads guilty to assault
Last update: June 1, 2009 - 9:13 PM
A man originally charged with 10 counts of second-degree assault and terroristic threats after he threw a 50-pound sandbag off the John Ireland Bridge onto Interstate 94 during the Republican National Convention pleaded guilty Monday in Ramsey County District Court.
David T. Mahoney, 24, who has no permanent address, pleaded guilty to one count of second-degree assault. The plea agreement calls for him to serve 90 days in jail after he is sentenced July 9 by District Judge Paulette Flynn.
According to the criminal complaint, Mahoney picked up a sandbag holding down a traffic sign and tossed it over the railing onto the freeway below. The sandbag did not hit a vehicle, but Mahoney was directing other protesters to throw sandbags when they were chased away by a squad car.
Investigators were able to identify Mahoney through a tattoo on his back, noticeable on surveillance photos that authorities took when the sandbag was tossed.
The bridge went over one of the primary routes that buses used to take delegates to the convention at the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul.
PAT PHEIFER
Next Headline - July 10
"Protestor with no permanent address gets temporary address at Ramsey County Jail"
What a fucking tosser you
What a fucking tosser you are. Do you know what a plea deal is? It obviously doesn't mean any conclusive guilt or factual substance regarding the situation.
Plea Deal...
Anonymous calls someone a masturbator ("tosser") because they don't know what a plea deal is. Non sequitor?
In Minnesota a plea deal results in the defendant pleading guilty to a specific crime. The defendant must state the facts of the crime (confession) to which she or he is pleading guilty. There must be a factual basis for the plea. The plea is a conclusive result to process for which the defendant will be sentenced. It is not impossible, but may be hard to withdraw a plea.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Plea+Bargaining
NEWS: defendant identified by tatoo admits dropping sandbag
Will be sentenced July 9.
http://www.startribune.com/local/stpaul/46674982.html?elr=KArks:DCiUoaW_eEO7UiacyKUUr
http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/121802/
http://www.twincities.com/news/ci_12496312?source=rss
http://www.twincities.com/minnesota/ci_12498752
no subject of the assault
The Pioneer Press story proves this is bullshit. Mahoney's alleged sandbag never hit anyone -- how could he have assaulted no one (and frankly is it possible to assault a bus, even if it did hit one - which it didn't?!)
Who is the subject of Mahoney's assault? County prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich for assaulting a refrigerator on similar grounds, true? If I punch a bus, am I assaulting it?
Ummm...the bus wasn't empty, there were people on it...
http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2008/09/video-rnc-bus-attacked-on-way-to-xcel-center/
Ok..so lets use your
Ok..so lets use your argument. I shoot at you at while you're on a bus, and I miss. I guess then by your argument I did not assault you since I missed.
what is assumed can't be
what is assumed can't be proven, that he was trying to hit the bus with a sand bag. Whereas we have no idea without knowledge of a number of variables, whether he even through a sandbag, was attempting to block the bus or hit it. Shooting at something is fairly obvious, this obviously isn't. Yet, you're simply incable of realizing the obvious.
sandbags are for holding things down...
I agree with "What Would I Do Under Similar." Please don't drop things from bridges. Consider the consequences of your actions. What Mahoney did is very different from folks walking through the street without permits, moving signs into largely empty roadways. Articles that don't distinguish Mahoney's unacceptable act from acceptable nonviolent tactics are not doing the left any favors. How far will you go? Look at the abortion doc that was killed. Deep abhorence mixed can lead to extreme acts. Anger without compassion is scary and dangerous.
Are you serious? Did you just
Are you serious? Did you just ignore the whole drawn-out process of the working together of the various protest groups against the RNC that happened over the last 18 months. Remember the St. Paul Principles? Look, I tend to think that lots of folks do property destruction and other "violent" things that don't hurt people in inappropriate situations that don't move anything forward or change anything. Any kind of action has got to be strategic. But putting a blanket condemnation on anyone who does any kind of actions outside of "acceptable nonviolent tactics" is super privileged. Ever been on a picket line to save your job or face down a cop who is beating your friends? I'm thinking not.
Ahem, read the post again...more carefully this time
Read what I wrote again. I never condemned anyone. I condemned an act. Have you never done anything that you regretted later?
If someone had been seriously injured by any of the bridge throwing acts would you be singing the same solidarity tune "any act is okey dokey"? If the left doesn't check each other, we'll get policed and eventually someone will get seriously harmed.
BTW, you can support the person in their difficult situation (solidarity with the person) without supporting the action that got them there. Person with lung cancer that smokes, person with liver disease that drinks, person with poor health that makes bad eating decisions, person that is facing jail for throwing sandbag. Hello!!
depends who the someone was
depends who the someone was
Post new comment