Rally for Justice for Fong Lee
UPCOMING EVENTS
May 7, 2009
**********************************************
RALLY FOR JUSTICE FOR FONG LEE
Unarmed man killed by Minneapolis cops
Monday, May 11, 8:45 a.m.
Federal Courthouse
316 N Robert Street, St. Paul
Parking/transportation
Shuttle buses will be available starting at 8:00 a.m. from
Lao Family Community of Minnesota,
320 W University Ave, St. Paul
OR meet at 8:00 a.m. at
Joseph’s Grill,
140 Wabasha St S, St. Paul, and march with others across the Robert Street bridge to the Courthouse
On July 22, 2006, Fong Lee was riding his bike with friends when Minneapolis cop Jason Andersen and state trooper Craig Benz decided a little "aggressive policing" was in order. They rode their squad car up on the group of young men and, according to several witnesses, hit the rear tire of Fong's bike. Fong either fell or jumped off the bike as the officers ran out of their squad car. Andersen was pointing his gun as he chased Fong through a school playground. Andersen shot Fong 4 times in the back. As Fong lay dying, Andersen shot him 4 more times. 31 seconds after the start of the encounter, Fong Lee was dead. Throughout the entire ordeal, Benz never pulled his weapon.
MPD Lies and Corruption
After the killing, MPD claimed Fong had a gun. However, witnesses and evidence point strongly to a gun being planted on the scene by cops. The gun cops claim was recovered next to Fong's body was in their property room up to the time of the shooting and was likely brought on the scene by a sergeant. The gun had no fingerprints, DNA or blood on it. Further, Fong had a defensive wound in the palm of his dominant hand. The squad car video was rendered useless because it remained in the squad car to which Andersen had access for 10 days after the incident and has, according to experts, been partially erased. What the cops didn't count on is a video of the incident captured by a camera at the school. That video clearly shows that Fong never had a gun.
Case of Extreme Importance to Community
This case is emblematic of all that is wrong with the MPD and the judicial system that backs them up. Racial profiling, corruption, manipulation of evidence and outright lies are all part of this case. Immediately after the incident, cops went into spin mode to dirty up Fong Lee with lies that he was a gang member or criminal (he was neither). An internal non-investigation exonerated Andersen and a bogus grand jury process gave prosecutors political cover not to prosecute Andersen. The story about the gun has changed at least three times. Hennepin County if fighting tooth and nail to block release of the grand jury transcript even to the Lee family's lawyers. On top of everything else, the MPD spit in the face of the community by pinning a medal of "valor" on Andersen.
Lee Family Seeks Justice--Stand with Them!
The Lee family has always held that their son was murdered by Andersen based on race. They have bravely stood up to the lies and corruption of the MPD and continue to press forward, recognizing the importance this case has to the community. We must stand with this family as they try to bring at least some good out of Fong's death by forcing this system to be accountable and as they push for changes to prevent such tragedies in the future. This case goes to court on May 11 and there is a rally outside the courthouse.
WE NEED YOU THERE
to show the courts that the community supports the Lee family's demands for justice.
Rally sponsored by
Coalition for Community Relations, Communities United Against Police Brutality, Lao Family Community of Minnesota, Inc., Minneapolis NAACP, Take Action Minnesota.
JUSTICE FOR FONG LEE!
TAKE AWAY ANDERSEN'S MEDAL!
INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR!
PROSECUTE KILLER COPS!
______________________________
Communities United Against Police Brutality
3100 16th Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55407
Hotline 612-874-STOP (7867)
Meetings: Every Saturday at 1:30 p.m. at Walker Church, 3104 16th Avenue South
http://www.CUAPB.org
- 1190 reads
- Printer-friendly version


Comments
This is perhaps the most
This is perhaps the most biased write-up I've ever read. Could you possibly leave your opinions out and report the facts or is that too much to ask? The cops decided a little "agressive policing" was in order? Who do you think you are to be able to put yourself inside the mind of the cops? The gun was "likely brought on the scene by a sergeant"? According to whom? If you could provide more facts to back up your assumptions/biases, that would be fantastic.
Cop, you're wrong!
First of all, the term "aggressive policing" came right out of Jason Andersen's affidavit. Secondly, the gun issue was cited in multiple witness affidavits and was widely published in the media. It is you who are biased--in favor of killer cops. Or, more likely, you are a cop. Otherwise, why the anonymity? If you're so proud of your ignorant comments, use your name.
Michelle G.
Communities United Against Police Brutality
Knowing that it's futile to
Knowing that it's futile to have a respectful debate on this site, lest you be inevitably be cast as a cop, I'm not interested enough to be "involved". I do find it interesting that I am being called biased on this subject by a member of the Communities United Against Police Brutality. Now that's ironic considering I'm neither a cop nor a victim of police brutality or a member of any supporting group.
How is it that you've attributed ignorance, or even a biased point of view to me, given that my original post states neither? If anything, I'm biased towards the truth, and in search of it, regardless of which side the pendulum ends up swaying towards. The "gun issue" was not the question that was being asked. I was asking what report said or who said the gun was LIKELY placed on the scened by a sergeant. If that was a personal opinion, then state it as such so that it will be apparent to all that facts are not important to the author. Also, could someone post the affidavit? I'd like to see what it actually says.
No, no, the oppressive
No, no, the oppressive environment here that stifles dissent is a good thing, because it ensures, in a not-at-all-authoritarian way, the cohesive ideological purity of our Movement. Can't be the Loyal Opposition if we don't all pay sufficient lip service to the same, fetishized, talking points, what?
Go report to your Collective's Political Officer for "accountability", Comrade... and shame on you for your free-thinking disloyalty!
Hey dumbass, If you are
Hey dumbass,
If you are searching for the truth, the Pioneer Press has been following this story for quite a while. Go to www.pioneerpress.com and search Fong Lee. The writer for this article has written exactly what has been reported from the press/individuals involved. Pioneer Press has documented police response to all that's going on as well as the allegations against the police department.
I guess if video surveillence showed that Fong Lee didn't have a gun in his hand and if police had not planted the gun there, it must have been a ghost who just so happened to drop the gun off at the MURDER scene huh. Yeah, that theory seems most plausible and most unbiasness right?
There is no biasness in this story. There is only truth. Fong Lee was murdered by a member of the police department. Simple as that.
Hey Sara
Thanks for the link. Have you been following the coverage by the Pioneer Press or did you just choose a paper and post the link to look informed? In case you weren't aware, I read that there is an upcoming court case in this situation. I'm not sure how this could possibly be true considering that you have already decided what the truth is (and so tactfully posted it above).
Despite your vast knowledge and the way you have tastefully articulated it, that isn't the end of the story. Do you know that none of the stories provided by the Pioneer Press state that the gun was LIKELY placed on the scene by a Sergeant? It's not my place, your place, the author of this post's place to determine whether a sergeant, ghost, Fong Lee, or anyone else placed a gun on the scene. It's for a court to decide. Any assumption to the contrary is an indication of bias on your part.
Now, the next time you want to insult someone that is only attempting to question whether a person is being truthful or not, please ask for a friend's advice before you post. I'm sure you have friends that will be able to tell you where you have gone wrong. In this case, it's your evaluation of what the truth is before all of the facts have been evaluated by a court of law. Now, don't get me wrong, it's a great idea to discuss the evidence and attempt to piece things together. You just don't have to speak from a position of unequivocal authority. You understand that, right? Oh right, you're an activist so you automatically don't trust authority, the court system, etc. What was that word I originally brought up? Oh yeah, bias.
Hey Sara
Thanks for the link. Have you been following the coverage by the Pioneer Press or did you just choose a paper and post the link to look as if you had all of the answers? In case you weren't aware, I read that there is an upcoming court case in this situation. I'm not sure how this could possibly be true considering that you have already decided what the truth is (and so tactfully posted it above).
Despite your vast knowledge and the way you have tastefully articulated it, that isn't the end of the story. Do you know that none of the stories provided by the Pioneer Press state that the gun was LIKELY placed on the scene by a Sergeant? It's not my place, your place, the author of this post's place to determine whether a sergeant, ghost, Fong Lee, or anyone else placed a gun on the scene. It's for a court to decide. Any assumption to the contrary is an indication of bias on your part.
Now, the next time you want to insult someone that is only attempting to question whether a person is being truthful or not, please ask for a friend's advice before you post. I'm sure you have friends that will be able to tell you where you have gone wrong. In this case, it's your evaluation of what the truth is before all of the facts have been evaluated by a court of law. Now, don't get me wrong, it's a great idea to discuss the evidence and attempt to piece things together. You just don't have to speak from a position of unequivocal authority. You understand that, right? Oh right, you're an activist so you automatically don't trust authority, the court system, etc. What was that word I originally brought up? Oh yeah, bias.
Rules Of Engagement
I think that these Police Officers should be fired and locked up for the rest of their lives for murder. Do these officers even know what the RULES OF ENGAGEMENT are? Did Fong Lee ever shot at them? In any way did the Police Officers ever felt that their lives was threatened? All I see in the video is a kid scared half to death and running for his life. Being in the military for 8 years I know that I can’t engage at the enemies until they engaged at me. This is why tax dollars are so high these days to pay for stupid ignorant Police Officers like these guys. Plus they even got a medal for shooting a innocent kid. What a bunch pathetic people running our city these days. A while back Chief Dolan even gave medals to those police officers that raided the wrong Hmong house up in North Side Minneapolis. Wonder how much our tax dollars paid for the settlement in that law suit. These [epithet redacted for offensive comments- eds.] needs to get their acts right or we’ll be paying for their stupid actions for the rest of our lives. Open up your eyes people.
Staff Sergeant, you know
Staff Sergeant, you know better than that. You're going to take a shaky, few second long video and decide that the rules of engagement were not followed and this is murder? I'd hate to be a soldier if that were the standard applied to how an enemy is handled. Does this video tell the whole story or were there also other moments that weren't captured? Look at the video again at around the 2:00 to 2:05 mark and you might get the answer you're looking for.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILvkEHQPHHg
Post new comment