MIRAc: Build Unity to Fight for Immigrant Rights
Build Unity to Fight for Immigrant Rights
A response to Francisco Gonzalez
Introduction
We bring forward this letter in the spirit of encouraging unity in the immigrant rights movement in Minnesota. This is a reply to an email sent to various email lists including the la-mano yahoogroup email list on October 20th (see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/la-mano/message/4879 ) by Francisco Gonzalez, a respected immigrant rights advocate in Minnesota. We feel that parts of his message are damaging to the important task of building unity in the movement, and we wanted to respond. In his October 17th message, he made a public criticism of anarchists and of the activist group Anti-Racist Action (ARA). He bases his criticisms on a protest in Austin, MN on October 17th, when anti-racists and immigrant rights activists confronted a small anti-immigrant rally organized by the neo-Nazi group, the National Socialist Movement (NSM).
But Mr. Gonzalez doesn't just criticize. He goes further and calls for explicitly excluding ARA and anarchists from the immigrant rights movement. In his email, he says:
Exclusion Creates Division in the Movement
MIRAc strongly condemns calls for exclusion of organizations and entire ideologies from the immigrant rights movement.
MIRAc views the call for exclusion of ARA and anarchists in particular as wrong, harmful, and divisive.
It is wrong politically, because calls to exclude people with radical ideas from progressive movements are wrong in general. It is rehashed McCarthyism and we reject it. Through the history of social justice movements in the U.S., calls to exclude anarchists, communists or other radicals have always resulted in weakening the movement, both practically and politically.
Confronting racists and fascists is right
It is also wrong politically because the protest in Austin on October 17 was an important effort to confront the neo-Nazi movement in Minnesota on their own turf. Context is crucial. A couple weeks earlier, the Austin-based National Socialist Movement had organized a protest in Minneapolis against an anti-racist workshop at the YWCA on Lake Street, in the heart of the Latino community. This was the first neo-Nazi attempt to organize in Minneapolis in years. Progressive, anti-racist community members organized a rally against this Nazi provocation of the immigrant community, and successfully drove the Nazis out of Minneapolis. This was just weeks after the same neo-Nazis showed up at an immigrant rights activity in Austin, something they have increasingly been doing there.
It is important to note that there has been no attempt by neo-Nazis to organize publicly in Minneapolis for years. This is precisely because of the excellent work that many people did (including many anarchists and ARA, people of color and white anti-racists) in the 1980s and 1990s to confront the Nazis every time they tried to get a foothold. In other cities where this did not happen, neo-Nazis succeeded in gaining an ongoing presence. MIRAc is thankful to the comrades from ARA and other groups that helped make Minneapolis a city where Nazis aren't able to publicly operate, and we continue to stand with all anti-racist activists who confront Nazis and other racist forces everywhere they try to gain a foothold. The Nazi presence in Austin has not gone away, and is an ongoing hazard to everyone organizing for progressive change. ARA and other anti-racists are right to confront the Nazis wherever they try to organize.
While MIRAc didn't organize the October 17th protest in Austin, we have organized direct action and civil disobedience protests (for example the action at ICE headquarters in Bloomington on May 6th where 31 people were arrested to protest raids & deportations, and an action collaborating with Dakota activists at Fort Snelling confronting ICE officials at a public meeting). We always take great care to ensure that there is a separation of time or space between activities that might risk arrest, and legally permitted protests that are more safe to attend for people who don't wish to risk arrest. The safety of members of the immigrant community is a central concern when we organize any activity. But this legitimate concern should not be used as a reason to attack anti-racist activists who understand the importance of challenging neo-Nazis. We think we are strong enough as a movement to address the safety of immigrant communities while being able to confront neo-Nazis that threaten immigrants (and many others).
Keep Criticisms Internal to the Movement
Rather than deal with issues within the movement internally, this criticism was made on a public email list, where anybody and everybody can see division within the movement, including the neo-Nazis who literally want to terrorize the immigrant community (among others). We urge him to reconsider this approach of public criticisms and calls for exclusion from the movement. We would point to the St. Paul Principles that were adopted by most progressive activists in the Twin Cities leading up to the Republican National Convention protests, as a model. The key principle in this case was that no activist group would publicly criticize another group in the movement. We have seen in recent years how the right wing and the media love to tell the story about a division between "good protesters" and "bad protesters". We will not play into that story line. Instead we will keep the focus on the issues by refusing to play the game of criticizing other protesters. This worked with the RNC protests. We think the principle should continue to be used -- lets deal with criticisms among progressive forces internally. Direct dialogue helps everybody understand each other better, requires more political maturity, and makes the movement stronger overall.
Build Unity
MIRAc has focused since its inception on winning legalization for all undocumented immigrants, and on stopping raids and deportations. MIRAc is made up of immigrants, our families and allies. We have participants who are Latino, White, Asian, Native American, Somali, and more. MIRAc includes people who identify themselves as progressive, radical, socialist, anarchist, religious believers of various faiths alongside devout atheists, and people who don't define their ideology but just want to work for immigrant rights. We think this is the right approach. We have proven in practice that unity can be built to fight for immigrant rights. Most MIRAc members are not anarchists, but there are anarchists in MIRAc (and in many other immigrant rights organizations) that have dedicated their lives to fighting for immigrant rights, and have made great contributions to the movement. We see calls to exclude some of our comrades in the struggle as politically harmful and personally offensive.
We believe in uniting as many people as can be united to take action for immigrant rights. Calls for exclusion are the wrong way to go.
In unity and struggle,
Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Coalition (MIRAc)
miracmn@gmail.com
http://mirac1.wordpress.com
- 816 reads
- Printer-friendly version


Comments
It is clear from the photos
It is clear from the photos of the action in Austin that the majority of the ARA folks and their allies who went to confront the NSM were of european descent. Should the NSM be confronted and not allowed to successfully recruit and moblize in Austin? Clearly yes. Is it important for european americans to confront the ugly underbelly of white supremacy, and do we have a special responsibility to take that on? Again, yes. However, the tactics of direct confrontation at street actions creates an atmosphere of potential violence and intimidation that does not allow many people with considerably less priviledge in this white supremecist society to participate. It also creates a public spectacle and becomes the story, the dialogue that is had by the larger dominant society. It becomes the voice of white people trying to shout down white people, and what gets lost in this is the voices of immigrants and their concerns. It is important to march at the back of a movement, not to put ourselves as white people out there in front, especially when the people who are most impacted by the NSM and their hate are around and fully capable of speaking for themselves, to articulate the issues and to decide even what the issues and tactics should be that will move the whole movement forward. It may in fact turn out that the NSM may need to be confronted in other ways at other times.
(removed)
(vulgar namecalling is not going to be permitted here).
brilliant letter while I have
brilliant letter
while I have my criticisms of the Austin confrontation, simply cutting off extremely dedicated people is like cutting off one's own arm (except Trots; then it's more like cutting off gangrene).
In the future, for actions where there might not be more than a handful of cops on duty (so, outside major cities), more public (but anonymous of course) planning is necessary. I never heard of any plans for a confrontation or I would have brought a few folks.
OTOH in light of the publicity blackout Bash Back!'s organization continues to impress... although maybe a megamarch-style bloc wasn't the best plan, eh? It's rural Minnesota!
no vulgarity
that guy?? To hell with him!
that guy?? To hell with him!
Respect?
"No vulgarity" says s/he has no respect for Francisco Gonzalez because of his views against direct action, referring to things he wrote during the RNC protests. While I agree with No Vulgarity and disagree with Gonzalez on the question of direct action, I think it's also wrong to say you have no respect for him based solely on this question. In fact Gonzalez does merit respect, because he does ongoing advocacy for Latino immigrants (and non-immigrant Latinos) in Southern Minnesota, which is not easy work, and he also supports the struggles of other oppressed peoples. If he wasn't worthy of respect, then MIRAc wouldn't have bothered to respond to him. It is precisely because he has commitment and does work that is worthy of respect, that it's important to engage his views on the question of the relation of civil disobedience and direct action to legal protest tactics. I think he has a wrong view on the question, but lets engage the question. In his response to the MIRAc statement he fleshes out his views in a more thorough way (see here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/la-mano/message/4899 ). Lets engage these important issues with respect, not flippantly declare no respect and shut down the discussion.
You make a good point. I
You make a good point. I shouldn't outright dismiss someone because of their insistance on working for reform within the system or their naive beliefs regarding media coverage and police violence.
It's the idea that organizers should work with the police that gets me. I simply cannot work with you if you think that's a valid option. I applaud Mr. Gonzalez for the work he's done and regret my poor choice of words, but we can never be comrades if he's going to side with the cops any time we have a disagreement about tactics. That part of his worldview is something I do not respect.
Post new comment