Thursday: The People's Anger and the Property Destruction Debate Both Rage On
Part One by haloka
***
The [People's Uprising] march has a potential for violence because it is unapproved and the organizers cannot be held responsible for the behavior of the attendees. Our Intel has identified about 400 people who will be attending and an accurate count of all others isn't feasible. Rest assured that we are well prepared to respond to this march and the possibility of any property damage in the Strip is minimal.
We have amassed the largest grouping of law enforcement officers that this area has ever or will ever see. Take comfort in knowing that we quell any civil disturbance."
-Message Wednesday from Assistant Deputy Chief Paul Donaldson, who was wrong,
***
After getting some much, much needed sleep after a comparatively uneventful but stressful Wednesday, I walked to the bagel shop Tuesday morning for breakfest. It took until I handed the woman behind the counter (whom I later found out to be somewhat of a neighborhood character) my credit card for her to figure out I wasn't a local.
Her eyes widened. "You're not a protester, are you?"
I explained what I was in Pittsburgh to do (film the demonstrations), and we ended up having a pleasant conversation about the many boarded up corporate businesses nearby. Those businesses' fears turned out to be warranted: by the time I went to sleep early the next morning, the list of smashed storefronts was long: McDonalds. PNC Bank. Citizens Bank. Fidelity Bank. Boston Market. Subway. H&R Block. KFC. BMW. And many more.
As for the woman's comment, I couldn't tell whether it came from a place of fear as a result of media hype, or from genuine curiousity. Either way, on Thursday many like her saw the police state and spirited demonstrations with radical anti-capitalist demands up close for the first time. And poor neighborhood residents, then University of Pittsburgh students, joined in the rowdy festivities.
In the afternoon we met at Arsenal Park on Penn Avenue for an unpermitted rally and march. The accompanying police presence was the largest I've seen in my life (although I wasn't on the street at the St. Paul RNC, so can't compare), but the authorities chose to mostly keep their distance instead. My filming partner and I made it to the front of the march, which only went 6 blocks before it was stopped by a massive police blockade, the main feature of which was an LRAD sonic weapon.
We first heard the LRAD two blocks away, blasting out a dispersal order in English and Spanish. As we got closer, the noise was deafening; at 25 feet, painful. Before long, the device - which some media reports have said was used yesterday for the first time in public in the USA, although the NYPD also possesses one - was blasting a high-pitched siren-like noise which gave the crowd no choice but to choose a different route.
My filming partner and I chose to move around to the opposite side of the police blockade where cameras were few. Fortunately, the LRAD is directional, so while still extremely loud, we could stand 25 feet to the side of it and film. At this point, we became lost from the main march, which was later gassed and mostly headed the opposite direction to regroup. The two of us investigated the secondary police blockade a few blocks further down, instead. This blockade on Liberty Avenue, apparently in case the march successfully found a route around the LRAD, consisted of several hundred riot police from at least three jurisdictions. When they started to don gas masks, we skirted north toward Penn Avenue and tried to find demonstrators again.
At this point we succeeded in finding a small breakaway black bloc of about 50 people, plus a few dozen accompanying non-black-blockers. Not even getting close to downtown, the block moved around the Garfield neighborhood, where poor residents came out on their stoops to witnesses items being pulled into the street. Some neighbors cheered and denounced the police. Others screamed at the demonstrators to leave; one came out onto his stoop brandishng a baseball bat.
The tactic was a defensive one to slowdown police behind the block - but this was by and large not readily explained to passersby, many of whom couldn't figure out why the anarchists were even there in the first place.
Back on Liberty Avenue, we took footage from behind a mobile field force unit of about 25 as the block pushed dumpsters down the hill towards them. Officers scrambled to push them out of the way, and the commanding officer lost control of his officers, screaming at them to get back in formation as the anarchists kept going. The episode provided a glimpse of the police behind the turtle gear and how easily they can lose control. At this point, the demonstrators had more composure.
As the riot lines began to close in, one lone man dressed in a cow suit (complete with plastic udder) used a different type of tactic to gain some time for the large group. For 5 minutes, he danced and did handstands in front of the advancing line of police, attracting a gaggle of journalists and cameras and effectively blocking the police's movement.
"You guys should be paying me to watch this!" he yelled at police with a smile, "But instead, I'm paying you!" Meanwhile, marchers went 2-3 blocks away.
As my first experience alongside a black bloc, I was struck most by its similarities with the mobile field forces. Both frantically screamed out commands; the police, from a commander, the black bloc, from many participants, leading to even more confusion and chaos. Both did not take time to explain their actions. Both were, to be frank, rather scary. But of course, one had substantially more resources than the other, while another had a substantially more astute political consciousness and resolve.
The bloc in one form or another ended up lasting for hours; it later moved on to a business district where its tactics were more appropriate and effective. But in Garfield, the bloc was tactically questionable.
As the cat and mouse game went on in Garfield, we decided to interview many residents leaning out their doors and passing by. Many were eager to talk about how their community never asked for this; they feel neglected by the city on a regular day. One man, named Paradise, whom I interviewed alongside a skirmish line of police, spoke both to me and the officers about how the PD consisted of working class men like him - true, to a point - and how they were the most disciplined he's ever seen at a protest - also perhaps true, to a point. With minimal prompting, however, he began to talk about the social justice issues affecting his neighborhood, particularly the "prison industrial complex," neglect of the homeless, and joblessness. Some of the police began to squirm.
A short while later, after another interview with black residents in front of run-down, graffitied row houses with used needles in the accompanying alley, we turned directly across the street to see the cops huddling up in the driveway of a condominium. The white residents of the condo were filling the cops' water bottles.
Although Pittsburgh organizing bodies drafted a set of Pittsburgh Principles modeled after the St. Paul Principles at the 2008 RNC pledging solidarity between differing tactics and organizing models, I haven't heard them mentioned here as of yet. I have however, heard many an anarchist scoff at the "liberal" permitted actions and many a liberal thank the police for attempting to quell the anarchists. In addition to the NLG green-hat legal observers we saw in St. Paul, in Pittsburgh the ACLU has added their orange hats to the mix, and markedly unlike the NLG, the ACLU takes notes and records demonstrators engaging in activity they deem inappropriate, even activities protected by the 1st amendment or by freedom of conscience.
Nonetheless, later in the afternoon, when the protests had moved to Baum Boulevard and I arrived after only to find hundreds of riot police blocking traffic and making the occasional snatch-and-arrest of both demonstrators and passersby, we spoke with many who began to understand that first they come for the anarchists, and you're next. One man was dragged and beaten in the middle of the streets as our camera rolled. An older man, invoking Gandhi, yelled from the sidewalk. "If you want to arrest me too, I'll go peacefully," he told them.
And they did.
The total after the afternoon actions: about 25 arrests. But after a somewhat spontaneous uprising around the University of Pittsburgh that ran late into the night, the total ran to around 60.
Part Two by skadi
Oakland is on Fire -- Just Another Thursday Night in Pittsburgh
Amidst the dreams I awoke to this morning of dark clad figures raging war on corporate perpetrators and their rats during the night, there is a lot to think about in terms of what occurred yesterday in conjunction to the meeting of the twenty global leaders of the world.
“I think you just saved our town from changing,” said one white guy at the bar -- speaking directly in response to what happened Thursday night in the Oakland area of Pittsburgh. “I was stand-offish to you at first, thinking that you and everyone else coming into town were going to change the industrial collapse that has made this community one of the best and cheapest places to live in the country”. Being witness to what happened in and around the northwest side of Pittsburgh and on the University campus; it seems that the anarchists (particularly the queer ones) and the college kids sent a pretty good message about their distaste in the corporate green agenda the G20 is trying to foster here in Pittsburgh. However, it’s hard to say exactly how the anarchist tactics played out yesterday.
In terms of eluding the police, the neighborhoods in and around Arsenal Park proved to be conducive to the thousand(s) of demonstrators that showed up for the “Peoples Uprising” march during the day. However, the lack of onlooker support from the neighbors brings up questions as to what kind of community support they were trying to create. “All of these white kids…they’re crazy,” said one man witnessing the tear gassing and “rioting” of the protesters on Baum Boulevard and Cypress Avenue. Another man was heard commenting, “Why are they protesting here, they are sending tear gas into the neighborhood”. Regardless or not if the neighborhood arena was the best place for the black bloc to throw a dumpster down the hill towards a line of riot police resulting in various detonations of tear gas, folks still found themselves in the realm of success. Corporate monstrosities like Boston Market, BMW car dealership, KFC, PNC Bank, Citizens Bank, Fidelity Bank and more that I’m still probably unaware of took numerous beatings from our black clad comrades. Only 23 arrests were actually accounted for by late afternoon.
Another interesting event that took place during this march was the role of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). I found myself more than once on the sidewalk alongside the ACLU legal observers in their orange hats. When the police showed up to corral people in with riot gear and canines (unsuccessfully) I heard ACLU observers comment, “Oh thank god they are here”. Shortly thereafter, three legal observers were standing on the corner with cameras recording a group of folks changing out of their clothes. It seems as if the militarized functioning of surveillance has spread to the realm of our legal observers. This has some interesting implications as to what type of work needs to be done to bridge the gaps across a diversity of tactics. Despite the disheartening fact of legal folks putting our friends into the dangerous hands of the law, people managed to remain standing for the night ahead.
After a short break in the form of a radical cabaret close to the University of Pittsburgh campus, Bash Back! contingents and their supporters donned their pink bandanas, glitter and banners and literally hit the town. What I thought was going to be a theatrical march quickly turned into a large band of roaming queers dawned in black. In the back of the march, I began to hear what I originally thought were rubber bullets being shot into the front of the crowd. However, the police had not yet responded to this quickly moving group – the sounds that I had been hearing were actually windows shattering. One after the other – the banks, the corporate chains, the police station, the University of Pittsburgh store were hit by various found objects, U-locks, rocks and wrenches. Bash Back! quickly disbanded – not before setting a dumpster on fire – as the very long line of riot police began to move in on them and the thousands of college kids that were on the Pittsburgh University campus wearing togas, team jerseys and high heels. As the police moved closer to the congregation of protesters and college-goers alike, smoke bombs, pepper spray and police brutality began to show their faces on the well to do tuition payers lining the University lawns.
What seemed like just another Thursday night of fun, turned into a militarized police state that caused the entire police force – literally all available units, according to a police scanner - to occupy the neighborhood of Oakland.
- 1806 reads
- Printer-friendly version


Comments
jagoff anarchists go home...
jagoff anarchists go home...
Idiot assholes go home
You mean like the POG and ResistG20.org folks FROM Pittsburgh that helped organize this event? They already are home. You'll be begging for their help in the future. Mark my words.
Brainwashed tea-bagger?
These corporate fascist brainwashed tea-baggers are a dime a dozen these days. Never have so many worked so hard against their own self-interest.
ACLU
This is interesting news about the ACLU observers. I personally support the ACLU's actions in legal cases, but this is disturbing. I wonder if they were infiltrated by the police or just so tied to the establishment that they can't bare to see a few windows broken by, literally, billion dollar companies while the planet dies before our eyes, thanks these companies. A sad set of priorities, to say the least. What kind of movement do we have when people are selling each other out because they ASSUME they have the correct sensibilities?
"What kind of movement do we
"What kind of movement do we have when people are selling each other out because they ASSUME they have the correct sensibilities?"
Aren't you assuming you have the right sensibilities yourself?
what about the non-corporates damaged?
You conveniently managed to forget mentioning the mom-and-pop businesses damaged. Makes the "protesters" sound all righteous until one hears about Lulu's Noodles, The Irish Design Center, Pamela's. Who else are the "protesters" going to hurt?
A broken window doesn't hurt a corporate giant at all. A broken window hurts a mom-and-pop business and their employees a LOT. Nice one "anarchists". Why don't you go pull the wings of some bugs for fun?
don't blame the anarchists
Anarchists are much more careful than police not to harm civilians or damage private businesses. The police have a free hand to tear-gas hundreds and hundreds of random people, from retired folks in their homes to student onlookers, while anarchists are blamed for every broken window in the city?
This may be news to you, but police provocateurs follow anarchists around doing everything they can to make them look bad. This has been corroborated over and over for as long as any of us can remember. Those broken windows at mom-n-pop businesses are as likely police provocateurs as anyone else.
Anarchists have principles; each anarchist acts deliberately according to his or her conscience. Police are mercenaries who do whatever they are told, at any risk to anyone, for a paycheck. Choose your poison.
ACLU
From what I've seen, the ACLU are an absolute menace when it comes to anarchist protestors. They will actively work to identify anarchist protestors, or people they *think* are anarchist protestors, and supply this information to prosecutors and police. It's the damndest thing I've ever seen. They fight for the rights of Nazis and white supremacists to march through Jewish neighborhhoods, but when it comes to anarchists and protestors whose looks they don't like, they're states' evidence. People need to be very wary of the ACLU, they're not friends. Also, their pamphlet on dealing with the police has factual errors and if the advice is followed as written, could lead to people getting themselves in a lot of trouble. The other thing is that the pamphlet is really long and complicated and can lead to (incriminating) misunderstandings by people who read it. FWIW, here's a simple guide for police encounters:
1. Don’t engage in conversation with them. They’re not on your side. Anything you say to them can and will be used against you in a court of law. Give your name and address and nothing else. If they ask you a question, ask them “Am I free to go?”. If they say yes, then walk away; if they say no, say “I want to talk to a lawyer” and say nothing more.
2. Never, ever consent to a search. If they ask you “Do you mind if I search your (house, car, purse, backpack)” say “I do not consent to a search” and say it loud enough so that others can hear you. If they ask to come inside your house, say no. If they come to your door, tell them to put the warrant in the mailbox, otherwise don’t open the door.
3. They can threaten you and lie to you and tell you all sorts of stuff to scare you or deceive you or manipulate you. All of their words are lies. They’re the adversary now and they will be the adversary in court. If you have an encounter with police, get people to write down what happened and write down the date and time, maybe get pics and video if you can, and get it to a lawyer ASAP. Police will lie in court, they’ll remember things which make you guilty and forget stuff which makes their actions criminally culpable. You, on the other hand, can’t lie. If you do, it’s a criminal offense. SO DON’T TALK TO THEM. PERIOD. NO CONVERSATION, just “Am I free to go?” “I want to talk to a lawyer” “No. I do not consent to a search” and your name and address; that’s all.
4. If you get arrested and get sent to jail, and there are people in the cell you don’t know before you came to town, don’t talk to them about what might have got you sent to jail. Anarchist theory, the weather, permaculture… just not anything remotely edgy. Same case for visitors on a phone, the cops do listen in and record these conversations, it’s just more evidence against you.
That should be enough. Write this on your arm: DON’T TALK TO THEM. PERIOD. NO CONVERSATION, just “Am I free to go?” “I want to talk to a lawyer” “No. I do not consent to a search” and your name and address; and the contact phone for your lawyer or legal collective.
Oh yeah, and until ACLU National comes out with a public statement directing their people not to act as police informants and co-enforcers, and the local chapters stop people from doing this kind of stuff, FUCK THE ACLU.
"They fight for the rights of
"They fight for the rights of Nazis and white supremacists to march through Jewish neighborhhoods, but when it comes to anarchists and protestors whose looks they don't like, they're states' evidence."
The goal of the ACLU is to protect the legal rights granted to everyone. They are quite consistent in this regard. Nazis and white supremacists, while unpopular, are exercising legal rights to freedom of speech and assembly. As soon as those white supremacists start smashing things, you can bet the ACLU will report exactly what they do.
(Some of) the anarchists in Pittsburgh are doing things well outside of their legal rights. That doesn't justify the police brutality. But it seems unreasonable to me to be mad at the ACLU for recording what happens.
on part one
i think part1 of this article is a pretty solid critique, except for the comparison of the black bloc to the police. I don't think it needs explaining of how the police are back by the prison industrial complex, given monopolies on violence, etc, and therefore i find the comparison offensive. I do agree with your critique that the BB may not have been tactically sound in Garfield for a LOT of reasons, including bringing extra police to an area already plagued by police violence. Is that what you meant?
get a clue
[try again minus the "asshole", "douchebag," etc and maybe this comment would stay...]
Post new comment