"Anarchist" Rapist Gets The Bat: We'll Show You Crazy Bitches 2

jacob onto is a piece of shit rapist. we are tired of accountability
processes that force the survivor to relive, over and over, the trauma of
assault; that force the survivor to put their reputation on the line as
“proof” of their credibility; that end up being an ineffective recreation
of the judicial process that leaves the perpetrator scot free, while the
survivor has to live through this for the rest of their life.

at the very least, the perpetrator should feel something, some lasting
mark of his behavior, something he will remember every time he has sex –
that is, if he ever has sex again. so we decided to make sure this is an
assault that jacob never fucking forgets.

we rolled in with a baseball bat. we pulled his books off his shelves: he
admitted it, not a single one mentioned consent. we made him say it: “i am
a rapist.” we left him crying in the dark on his bed: he will never feel
safe there again.

this is a precedent. this is the beginning of a new kind of accountability
process, one that leaves the perpetrator in pain – though this is still
only a tiny fraction of the pain that he has caused. we know that jacob is
not the only guilty one. we know there are more of you out there.

we are not sorry, and we will not stop: from now on, we will respond to
sexual violence with violence.

“if you touch me, i will fucking kill you.” let the roundups begin.

(a public service announcement: we encourage you to all use consent from
here on out. and let it be clear: consent is not the absence of a ‘no,’
but the presence of a ‘yes.’)

Comments

Disturbing Report

I like to think of myself as an anarchist, and I'm definitely not a pacifist. Yet I find this account, if it is accurate, to be profoundly disturbing.

What you describe is, in effect, a confession by torture. It is not much different from the U.S. pulling random people off the streets in Baghdad and Kabul and waterboarding confessions out of them.  And while a tiny percentage of those folks targeted by the U.S. were probably just as guilty of their crimes as "jacob" is of his, that still doesn't justify torture.

Now, if you had directed your actions toward the State that creates and encourages the objective conditions that produce people like "jacob," that might be another matter.  As it is, you've only punished one rapist; you've attacked a symptom, but not the disease.

-timmy

"Your rights begin with your fist, but end at my nose."  -Ancient anarchist tenant

fortunately timmy it does not

fortunately timmy it does not matter what you think is an appropriate action for a survivor of sexual assault to take.

too bad those bat swinging beauties werent around when you compared their vengeance to waterboarding.

"Now, if you had directed

"Now, if you had directed your actions toward the State that creates and encourages the objective conditions that produce people like "jacob," that might be another matter.  As it is, you've only punished one rapist; you've attacked a symptom, but not the disease."

and why not do both?

"It is not much different from the U.S. pulling random people off the streets in Baghdad and Kabul and waterboarding confessions out of them."

no.  no no no no no.  rapists are not equivalent to random people on the streets of baghdad.  does this really need to be said?  i can see how - as a white man embedded in and profiting from rape culture, who i believe is speaking to another one - it may seem that way at first, only because survivors fighting back threatens us.  but how much have we men played the role of the US military against women, trans and genderqueer folks on US streets and in US bedrooms?  we are the undercover state of rape culture.  so in a way, yes, it is not much different from what the US does in baghdad and kabul.  but we - men - are the perpetrators.

i feel this comparison is so, so wrong and offensive.  not just to targets of survivors and targets of sexual assault and rape; but it should be to the rest of us as well because the anarchist movement is not much of a legitimate, honest movement when rapists are allowed to operate free from accountability.

(futhermore, what is described hardly amounts to the torture committed by the US military, making this comparison even more ludicrous.  i mean, c'mon now.  seriously.)

How Is It Different?

A bunch of soldiers kick down the door of an apartment in Baghdad, tear up the place, terrorize the residents, and leave.

A bunch of "anarchists" kick down the door of an apartment in NYC, tear up the place, terrorize the resident, and leave.

I don't see much of a difference in either case.  Both acts are the result of the same culture of violence, it is only the scale of the violence that's different.

Furthermore, what happened in New York wasn't justice or accountability.  It was vigilantism, pure and simple.  And vigilante "justice" has a long and dark history -- a history that shows that kind of violence can quickly escalate out of control, taking down the innocent as well as the guilty.  It's a bad idea, at best; criminal, counterproductive and downright stupid, at worst.

I think this is in NYC, based

I think this is in NYC, based on the fact that it follows up a similiarly named action that happened last week. I'm not sure if this stuff is for real or not, but it's stupid. NYC anarchists have got to get their shit together. I'm also not ruling out the idea that this stuff is a fake by a joker or the cops, trying to mess with us. So let's not get too riled up about it til we get some confirmation.

It is in NYC. The survivor is

It is in NYC. The survivor is a friend of mine, it's as real as I am, and snitchjacketing is unhelpful, to say the least.

Think, Timmy, think

I am not a fan of this sort of action, but victims confronting a perp and doing a little property destruction is FAR from state sponsored torture. The power dynamic is completely different, just for one. They don't mention actually beating him up. I hope that is correct.

I don't want to be bitter,

I don't want to be bitter, angry, or in violation of TC-IMC's occasionally stifling and authoritatian double standards of censorship, but I am very much not displeased that this has happened, and I strongly suspect that the only tears I - and many people I know - would shed were similar, long overdue actions to take place in MN, would be tears of joy.

 

Talking doesn't stop rapists.  Maybe baseball bats don't, either, but a sample size of one is not a valid way to find out.

Both sides of this are pretty

Both sides of this are pretty fucked up.

TC IMC editorial note

Someone posted a comment here earlier today impersonating the survivor, claiming that "we sent him to the emergency room with broken bones." We have checked with the people involved and this is patently false; no bones were broken, and the comment was posted by somebody other than who it was claiming to be.

Impersonation and lies will not be tolerated here, and should not be tolerated anywhere.

I am not sure who you checked

I am not sure who you checked in with. But he was sent to the hospital. I dont know if his bones were broken but yeah.

you'll note that the only

you'll note that the only fact in dispute was whether or not his bones were broken.  you don't get points for reiterating what no one was arguing in the first place.

that being that he was sent

that being that he was sent to the hospital.  everyone has accepted that, don't posit it again as some special information you have.

just to clear it up. i was

just to clear it up. i was not trying to argue. just pointing out that he was sent to the hospital to clear up confusion.

he went to the hospital and

he went to the hospital and they sent him home with advil. 

Ugh

Looks like some folks haven't caught on to transformative justice. It's generally questionable when your response is as fucked and unaccountable as the action you are protesting. Individualism, machismo and old-school antifa antics aren't a solution and never have been. How about we try for a nuanced analysis? Rape culture isn't going to be deconstructed by individual acts of reactionary vandalism.

Signed,

 A rape survivor who believes in transformative justice and is sick of reactionary individualist identity politics

Havent caught on to

Havent caught on to transformative justice? Or maybe they are fucking sick of "transformative justice" allowing rapists to repeat their actions time and time again. Maybe they are not okay with transformative justice being used as a tool for activists to pat eachother on the back and pretend like they are solving problems when in reality their accountability programs lead to absolutely no real accountability. 

And as a supposed survivor of sexual assault you should know that the survivors wishes come first. IF the survivor wants someone to get the shit kicked out of them months after they were raped and no one did shit...then I say fuck your transformative justice program and start picking up the bats.

Oh PS.  You are an asshole for claiming that someone fighting back against a rapist is as fucked up as a rapist raping someone. Looks like you havent caught on to reality yet.

Signed,

A rape survivor who is sick of transformative (in)justice and is sick of liberal feel good happy go lucky politics

Hear, Hear.

Hear, Hear.  The only thing "transformative justice" accomplishes in these circumstances is to turn - excuse me, transform - rapists into serial rapists, and I'm still looking in vain for the "justice" part of the equation.

I've never seen

I've never seen transformative justice actually used in the anarchist scene.  That's because transformative justice is for communities, not scenes.  Scenes use spectacular acts of violence and posturing to deal with their problems, and then act like it gets us any closer to anything.

That's why I prefer not to associate with the anarchist scene.

ooooh ooohhh please telll me

what is your working definition of "community"??

 

does yours have a mission statement i might peruse?

Transforming rapists into piles of indistinguishable flesh...

...or otherwise seeking revenge for their acts is much more appropriate than talking to them as if they were humans. No second chances.

The end.

Accountability Process

One thing thats made clear by this debate is that we are failing to effectively implement accountability processes and community responses to sexual assault.  If we were doing that - people probably wouldn't feel the need to get out the bat.

transformative jusice is all well and good...

Transformative justice is all well and good in certain instances - ie, if we were all living in an eco-socialist-utopia where rape culture has been addressed and eliminated; so that the only time someone feels violated is due to being looked at the wrong way, which is due to a genuine accident on the part of the violator - and has f*** all to do with power.

We don't live in that society.

We live in patriarchy where sexual assault is at pandemic levels. If rapists and other predatory abusers were made aware that their actions come with severe consequences (even if it is just someone's flat or car being trashed), then it has been shown that rape and abuse levels decline.

There is a war being waged against anyone who identifies as feminine and anyone whom patriarchy identifies as feminine (or those who act outside of the feminine role patriarchy says they ought to have). Or hell, anyone who patriarchy just plain doesn't like seems to be fair game for rape. Are you really telling us not to fight back against structural oppression? Would you say that to those who have experienced brutality from state or capitalists?

How about we have the boss of nestlé sit down with the enslaved children who were picking their cocoa beans to do transformative justice? Or how about the torturers within guantanamo bay sit down and do transformative justice with the people they tortured? Or how about the boss of x corporation who in full awareness signed documents allowing the the water in your neighbourhood to be poisoned over many years - causing your family's bodies to be riddled with cancers and neurodegenerative diseases leaving your mother paralysed and your infant children unable to see, talk or walk and consigned to a life of constant pain... and do transformative justice? Or how about, come the revolution, all those nasty capitalists who are killing us as they don't want to hand over their factories and lands, how about we sit them down, and we do transformative justice with them (that is if they don't shoot us in the process)?

Do you see how ridiculous transformative justice sounds?

Why would you fight against capitalist or statist abuse, yet not against the perpetrators of sexual abuse?

what if...

What if the boss of Nestle turned around and said "I don't care that you have been enslaved" and carries on enslaving more children after the TJ session?

What if the guantanamo bay torturers sit there saying all the people they tortured "deserved it", and carried on as they are "just followign orders"?

What if the CEO of x corporation said to you, "you don't matter to me, your family and children don't matter to me, the only thing that matters to me is my profits and my three mansions and two yachts. My daughter's ballet lessons are more important than your spine, more important than your children's sight, more important than your children's lives". And carried on filling your water with poison... how would you react?

What if the capitalists completely reject the TJ scenario and just keep on shooting us when we try to take their factories and agricultural lands?

The article made it clear that this was a serial rapists - a person who is/was predatory. A person who would do this again and poses a danger to *all* people, unless they were prevented from abusing again.

that is not what

that is not what transformative justice is.

RU Kidding Me?

Why would you fight against capitalist or statist abuse, yet not against the perpetrators of sexual abuse?

Is that a question?  Seriously?  You might as well be Junior Bush admonishing us with, "If you're not with us you're with the terrorists."

Of course we're all against the perpetrators of sexual abuse -- along with capitalist and statist abuse.  But I'm also against people arbitrarily assigning themselves the roles of judge, jury and executioner.  I think the previous U.S. administration (as well as the current one) was a pretty good example of why that's such a bad idea.

Brave new world

Has someone been wronged? Don't be a victim. Justice is just one visit to a sporting good store away. What a wonderful world we will create with our Louisville Sluggers of righteousness. Or if you're on a budget, borrow a child's bat and teach them how to inflict justice with it too. Let slip the dogs of war and maybe some croquet mallets too.

Take this down

Take this down, please. This statement being on-line helps no-one. This is a disgrace. Stop bringing more attention and heat down on all of this. TAKE THIS DOWN, PLEASE.

TAKE THIS DOWN

TAKE THIS DOWN

TAKE BOTH OF THESE DOWN!

I'm tired of people whining anytime they have to even think about sexual assault in their communities - you should remove their comments from this thread.

That's not why it should be


That's not why it should be taken down.  It should be taken down because Indymedia and anonymous forums on the internet are not the place to deal with specific situations of sexual assault.  Not to mention that this is extremely triggering to victims of violence and sexual assault, like myself.

and it is extremely

and it is extremely empowering to sexual assault survivors like myself. keep it up.

dead men can't rape.

They didn't kill him.

They didn't kill him.  Threatening someone with a baseball bat isn't the same as actually killing them. 

They didn't threaten him. 

They didn't threaten him.  They whacked him with a baseball bat and sent him to the hospital.

still didn't kill him.  this

still didn't kill him.  this isn't difficult to understand.

if murder is your solution, then do it, but i think it's clear that violence is not a deterrent.  or maybe you haven't been around the scene long enough to realize that.

homerun for an ambiguous victory

It's just that, a baseball bat to the head in the dark, snivelling, whining, pleading, i bet he even said, or mouthed the word "no". 

Let the overt war begin. The low intensity rape war has been intensifying within our circles for over a decade, not that it really started then of course, but a whole new entitlement among mactivist males.  It's not really about justice, it's more about people arming themselves against the predatory nature of our times. 

And if people are looking to point fingers, well, it is us guys, white, heterosexist, mactivists who have created this whole mess, and it's only going to intensify, because people can't really get into beat up the executives at Goldman Sachs or the Governor of Arizona, or the goddamn drone operators outside Las Vegas, so they are going to come for us, because we are predatory shits who won't stop. 

Transformative justice can work if everyone involved is committed to a revolutionary transformative process.  But that isn't the reality of our scene.   We aren't evolved enough to declare war on our system so we are going to declare war on eachother.

People are so shocked by this...because it could happen to you. Maybe you would have taken rape more seriously before now if you had a baseball bat roming the night of your scene dealing random home runs to  drunk entitled rapist 'organizers'. 

It's true that violence only begats violence, but who made their cock into a loaded gun asshole? 

So, in co-abusive

So, in co-abusive relationships, the person that gets smashed is just the one that's slowest to stand up for themselves?

 

I mention this because I've seen it happen. In radical communities, one of the most effective ways to avoid being tagged as an abuser is to beat the survivor to the punch, tell everyone that your're the REAL survivor, and tell people to get the bats. 

In terms of utilitarianism

In terms of utilitarianism and the systemic tidal forces this weighs back against, fuck yes. In terms of precedent 1) Engenders a race to escalate in co-abusive situations. 2) Ups the ante in our milieu's myriad existing interpersonal Machiavellian power struggles. 3) Like laying a playbook out for the cops.

While the inclination is obviously to say, 'so what if there's a tiny number of false accusations, a little unfair counter-balance in power dynamic is overdue,' and I tremble at even interjecting my voice regarding strategy on something deemed another's struggle, this shit breaks my heart just as it uplifts it and I'd really like to hope that continuing to work on widening communication nets + strengthening solidarity/intensity in social ostracization/confrontation still promises a more effective solution.

Loose lips sink ships

You know, given the overall legal/political situation we find ourselves in, perhaps going online to brag about committing felonies is not the absolutely best way to empower people to fight back against rape and other sexual assault.

The police and FBI are not stupid. Brutal, lazy, uncreative and deceitful, yes. But stupid? No. They've read all of this. This is all *evidence* now.  Maybe no prosecution will come out of it directly, but why give them even the tiniest bit of leverage? Why make their jobs easier?

The enemy is listening.

assault cases can't be

assault cases can't be pursued without a complainant.  boom.

felony?

Isn't aggravated assault a felony?  So it's a criminal case, no?

And if some of your former

And if some of your former comrades had beaten you up and trashed your apartment, you wouldn't be the slightest bit disposed towards talking to the cops, huh? Not even if they said you didn't have to be involved? That you would just be making sure that this kind of thing didn't escalate?

And what if you met someone, someone who had good politics, who didn't hold all this against you, and was maybe even interested in dating you? You wouldn't want to explain to them what your side of the story was, and how you're really sorry it all got blown out of proportion, and you're not such a bad guy? You wouldn't maybe consider talking late into the night with them about all the fucked up things you'd seen happen in the anarchist scene? About who had feuds with who, and who'd done even worse shit than you were accused of? You wouldn't tell them about who you suspected of being involved with beating you up?

And what if you were one of the flying squad, who carried out the people's justice? What if some woman started volunteering at the community space where you hung out, and had a story just like yours about being the survivor of sexual assault? And she was really angry, and really right on, and brought really tasty vegan treats to all the meetings, and maybe you would think she was really awesome, especially if it seemed like she might be interested in dating you? You wouldn't think about maybe telling her how good it felt to reclaim some space for yourself? After a long night of dumpster diving and drinking cheap beer, you'd never let anything slip about how good it felt to smash those yuppies' car windows?

FFS, the state is not fooling around anymore! This was all originally posted on a non-Indymedia site! As a comment on a piece that was critical of this kind of action! You don't think maybe some hipster kid would rather divulge an IP address rather than sit through 10 hours of questioning by the cops? People need to start thinking long and hard about what real "security culture" entails. Otherwise we're going to need a hell of a lot more defense committees.

make this postitive

I feel mixed about this. I'd encourage woman/men/x as well as survivors to have facilated community conversations on this topic.

Forgive but, don't forget.

"you know, they never really owned you
you just carried them around
and then one day you put 'em down
and found your hands were free"

very scary and deeply

very scary and deeply disturbing. the utterly self-righteous tone of this post and those who applaud it are playing with fire. this is not the world i want to live in. i have seen many successful, community-based approaches to sexual violence, and this is not one of them.

and, yes, i am a victim of sexual assault.

Interesting what the main concerns seem to be

It is both fascinating and telling how many of the 'concerns' about this action have to do with Security Culture and how this vigilantism is a tactic that could be used by the cops to destroy movements.  Or how this kind of assault can play into the hands of the State...

Hey there einstein, guess what, you find a more movement destroying action than rape itself and I'll personally throw you into the Hudson for being a bold faced liar and most likely a perpetrator afraid of your own actions coming home to roost. 

Rape is what is destroying our 'movements' our 'circles' more than anything else,

hands down more than anything else,

well, racism, classism, homophobia, vanguardism...but rape is an act of war, period.

And to all the 'grey area' mactivista boyz out there, get your heads out of the sand and go learn yourself something serious about consent, real active consent, real sexy consent, and see some radical transformation go on...

and to all the 'security culture' folks, our movement ain't really all that now is it?  come on and admit it, you are afraid of your own actions coming home to bite your ass like a aluminum bat...

not saying posse is gonna solve any problems, but rape is the act of war, and retaliation is self defense, nothing more, collective self defense and until we boyz start taking it real, real, serious, like more serious than all the discussion around street tactics and covert action then expect more late night louisville rendez vous.

Perhaps Now

Some may have some appreciation for the punishment beatings that take place in Belfast. For the record, Belfast is one of the safest streets for women to go out alone. Very, very few rapes. Because the COMMUNITY demanded it and knew that the police would not. Just pointing that out. Based upon personal experience.

Totally clueless

Security Vulture: How many prisoner benefits and court dates do you plan to go to this year? A lot, right? Did you ever stop to think that maybe if people in this movement were just a tiny bit less clueless about security, you'd be going to a lot less of those? Prisoner support and court support are not optional. We HAVE to do them. And everybody who goes out and gets themselves busted because they chose to play into the cops' hands is taking very, very limited resources away from the people who really need them. They are, in a very real sense, betraying our comrades who have already been arrested.

I agree that sexual assault helps to destroy our struggle. But so does adventurism. Right now I'm seeing about a thousand times as much adventurism as sexual assault in this scene. If you want to plan and carry out an intelligent, meaningful action, then I'm right there with you. But bragging about your crimes is the mark of an amateur criminal, and one who won't be on the streets for long. The adventurists in our scene like to castigate everyone else for not being radical enough. By which they mean "not reckless enough". But there's more to building an effective social movement than getting a swelled head and a badass rep for how down with violence you are. Violence certainly has its place in our actions, and anyone who wants to maintain the state's monopoly on violence is perforce not an anarchist. But I'd argue that the people who are strutting around and talking all this big talk are not really anarchists either. They're looking for ego validation and nothing more. The ones that don't get busted go on to be professors and non-profit administraitors. They think they are a vanguard, but they're just doing the cops' and provacateurs' work for them.

Do whatever you want to rapists, but be fucking smart about it, and don't expect me to come to your benefit dinner when your self-aggrandizing bragadoccio gets you locked up.

For The Record

I have absolutely no intention of doing anything against the law. That is the ONLY reason that I even reponded to this post. However, I do have actual real live experience on issues such as this. Quite a bit as a matter of fact. So if any are interested, then feel free to talk to me. I will be happy to chat.

The inane ness of the internet to deal with our problems

hey there totally clueless:

Some really good points.  Well put.  Yes, of course it's stupid to carry out actions that are going to get more people, potentially, put in jail.  Even dumber to brag about them on the internet,   I hear you loud and clear on that one.  Unless of course you are sending out a manefesto of sorts, a notice of a fundamental shift in how communities many or may not decide to respond to acts of sexual violence.

Understanding the roots of violence and what I would describe as acts of self-defense, are important in understanding the ways forwards.

People will always organize in their own self defense and self interest.  If people are being raped and the raping seems to not be abating with all the self help groups, often and led and instigated by perpetrators of late, then what are people going to do?  Ostracize?  Exile?  Those have been tried in many communities, just sends the perpetrator down the road to another community where they/he begin the predatory cycle again.

Circles/self-help groups, most often easily manipulated by manipulators.  Really, been there done that, for a long time.  Doesn't mean that some really powerful good comes out of it, but statistically not that effective.  Often allows mactivists a way back into a scene so that they can be trusted again, only to repeat their predatory patterns.

So, what happened that instigated this whole dialogue, will most likely continue to happen...and all of the finger pointing and gnashing of teeth and wishing it away in the name of security culture (often a code word for don't rock the boat when mactivists are called out), aren't going to do a damn thing.

It's as natural as a tornado, as powerful as a twister, and it's a warning, a warning to all of us, that unless we stop raping, yes, just fucking stop it, then someone is going to  huff and puff and blow our little activist house down.

And if I am ever in trouble legally, don't worry I won't be calling you to hang around and get free food at my trial.  Now is not the time to make idle threats, now is a time to listen to what is happening, what will continue to happen unless something changes friend.

No Accountability

Vigilantism is not anarchism. It's a sad day when the capitalist justice system looks better than the anarchist one. This whole ordeal makes it pretty clear why anarchism continues to be a scene rather than a movement. Why anyone would condone this amateur behavior is beyond me.